Windows 7 Revealed

Some people are wondering whether they shoulda card that runs DX 9 should do the job. If you have
make the move to Windows 7 or if they shouldinstalled a more basic 2D GUI, you should be able to
keep Vista or the venerable Windows XP. Now thatget by with a CPU running at 700 MHz
Windows 7 has been officially released to the marketFor Mac, Apple is obviously going to tell you that you
after a very long Beta period, we now haveneed a Mac to run OS X 10.6. As mentioned earlier,
sufficient knowledge about it and acquaintance with itthere are ways to run this operating system on a
to help you make a decision.PC, but that's not what we're talking about here. Still,
To begin with, most readers are probably well awareyour Macintosh must have an Intel CPU with at least
that Microsoft has been sputtering in the Operating1 gigabyte of memory and a 5 GB of hard drive
System arena since they made the decision to cancelspace. Unless you're skilled at magic, you will need a
support for XP. Both Windows Millennium andDVD drive to load the DVD (DUH!). Virtually all Macs
Microsoft Vista are viewed as failed Windowswill run 64-bit except for the core Solo model and
versions, much to the frustration of PC users stuckthe Mac mini from a few years ago. You can give up
with them on OEM computers. This accounts for thehope of running the new Mac OS on a non-Intel unit.
high hopes shoppers have placed in Windows 7. EvenUpgrading
though Microsoft Windows 7 is about the only OSLet's look at how operating system upgrades work
available on a new PC desktop or notebookwith Windows 7 compared to the others, most
computer, the existing user base is still reluctant tonotably upgrading from Windows XP. The majority of
upgrade to Windows 7 based on the bad failures ofWindows users are using XP right now. These users
recent history.can get a license to upgrade to Windows 7, but all
Alternative Operating Systemsthat will accomplish is saving money. Because of the
Computer users should be aware that more choicesdifferences in the two systems, you just won't be
are available for their computer OS than justable to upgrade XP in a way that your programs will
Windows. For instance, the most recent version ofstill work. This is pretty lousy, especially for users
Ubuntu's Linux compilation (version 9.10) has gainedwith tons of programs and files on their computer
impressive traction among power users and regularwho aren't interested in doing a fresh installation of
users alike. Apple's new OS, OS X 10.6, is wellthe new Windows followed by re-installing all their
received for the latest Macs. Also, since Macintoshessoftware. XP users need to be very careful when
are now x86 devices, power users are becomingconsidering making the move to 7. Should you have
proficient at modifying OS X 10.6 for use on regularthe need for Windows 7, you could try a program
computers (we will not go into that here). Whilethat allows you to choose operating systems at boot
assessing the competition for Microsoft Windows 7,or use your BIOS to swap between boot drives;
it is vital to include other Microsoft Windows varietiesotherwise, you are going to be stuck either with
such as Windows XP (what most computers are stilllosing programs or with Windows XP.
using and Microsoft Windows Vista.If you're trying to move to Windows 7 from Vista,
It's really not feasible to compare Windows 7 withthen you're in good shape because the upgrade
Mac OS or Ubuntu. Let's face it, very few computeractually works quite well, preserving your applications.
users are ever going to change to Macintosh andAlso, driver compatibility isn't a show stopper; you
vice versa. While Ubuntu Linux is increasing inwon't be in a mess in case a driver for 7 doesn't
popularity, its user base is still very small, and itsexist yet for one of your devices. Because of the
functionality is too limited for it to gain any"improvements" made to resource management in
prevalence. Still, these other operating systems will beWindows 7, users are told to expect a noticeable
discussed here as much as possible.performance difference on the same machine after
Hardware requirementsupgrading.
A good method to evaluate operating systems forApple users with the old Mac platform are not going
review is the hardware required to run it. Certainly,to be able to upgrade to the latest OS X. This puts a
older operating systems like Windows XP havelarge percentage of users behind the 8 ball, but - as
requirements that appear useless. Pretty much allwith Microsoft - such is the cost of progress.
computers that still function will run Windows XP (ofAssuming you have an Intel platform, you should
course we know that there must be a few left thatexpect a smooth upgrade.
won't even run Windows 3.1). The hardwareUbuntu, of course, has the easiest upgrade path, but
necessary to run Vista is dependent on the versionthat won't be of much help since most computer
that you are using. For Vista Home Basic, you need ausers don't use it.
CPU that runs at least 1 GHz, has 512 MB of RAMDrivers
and a video adapter that is capable of running DX 9The pandemonium that surrounded Microsoft's
and having 32 MB of video memory. Hard drive spacerelease of Vista was caused by its failure to ensure
required is 15 GB. For other versions, thedriver availability for existing computer devices.
requirements are the same, except that you need atBecause of the lessons learned from Vista and from
least 1 GB of RAM and at least 128 MB of videothe amazingly long beta for Windows 7, the
memory on your video adapter.availability of Windows 7 drivers is not considered to
You'll see that the Windows 7 requirements arebe a serious problem especially since Vista drivers will
somewhat like those of Windows Vista, althoughusually work.
they vary somewhat between the 32 and 64-bitHave you ever noticed that Mac users don't
versions. 32 bit installations require 1 GB of memory,experience the driver nightmares that PC users do?
while the 64 bit version requires 2 GB. The 32-bitThere's a reason for that. The only driver problems
version of Windows 7 requires at least 16 GB of hardyou should expect to have are those resulting from a
drive space while the 64-bit edition needs 20 GB. Formigration from PC to Mac because some PC
both flavors you also need a video adapter that willhardware does not have a compatible Mac driver
run DirectX nine with WDDM 1. 0. You probably couldavailable.
guess that you need to be able to read the mediaIf you have ever used Ubuntu, you know that you
(such as DVD) that the operating system comes on.will be in driver hell, so there's really no talking about
Trying to figure out the specific requirements forit. Most of your older hardware will work with no
Ubuntu Linux can be very difficult because of theproblems, but the lack of Ubuntu drivers for current
different optional installation modes that are available.hardware is one of the most troubling aspects of the
If you are going to use a 3-D interface like Compiz,OS. People using Ubuntu probably won't even care,
you will need at least a 1.2 GHz CPU, 8 GB of hardsince they are used to their stuff not working. The
drive space and 384 MB of RAM. You obviously willfirst person to get a decent Linux release that will be
have to have a graphics card but it is hard tousable for the average computer owner; it might get
determine what the minimum requirement is, thougha footing in the OS market.